HD.5197

Our Massachusetts Judicial and State government officials have severely abused and violated the Judicial and State government officials immunity privileges which they have abused the citizen constitutional rights. Their conducts does not only violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known but they have dehumanizing and disenfranchised the people of Massachusetts especially the most vulnerable protective class category.
IMMUNITY DEFENSES DO NOT SHIELD STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM LIABILITY.
STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS invoke two principal immunity defenses under § 1983: qualified immunity and absolute immunity. Qualified immunity shields government officials from damages liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.
OUR STATE JUDICIAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS are not entitled to qualified immunity where they violated due process in judicial proceedings.
Absolute Immunity Does Not Shield Routine Administrative Acts.
Absolute immunity does not apply prosecutors and judges if they are performing core functions in good faith.
Absolute immunity does not apply to officials performing core functions that have been historically accorded total immunity—namely judges, prosecutors on quasi-judicial functions, and legislators on legislative acts if they not are acting in good faith.
The mere fact that they are “appointed executive officials” does not confer blanket immunity.
State executives are not absolutely immune for Title VII and due process claims. Official and qualified immunity do not protect officials acting with malice, bad faith, or deliberate indifference.
“Actual malice” requires “deliberate intention to do wrong” beyond mere ill will; official immunity lost where malice shown.
Deliberate Indifference Defeats Immunity. While a Judge performing Judicial functions may enjoy Immunity, denial of constitutional and civil rights are absolutely not a judicial function and conflicts with any definition of a Judicial function and a state court judge did not have absolute immunity from damages suit under § 1983.
A minority of decisions have held that if an inferior judge acts maliciously or corruptly he/she may incur liability and under the Federal tort law, judges cannot invoke judicial immunity for acts that violate litigant’s civil rights.
Any state government official or judge who segregated our court houses, practice unethical corruption, obstruction of justice, bias, prejudice, racism, discrimination, hate crime, inhumane tortures, abuse, and cruelty and tainted our judicial system should not have absolute immunity.
State government officials or judges have used absolute immunity to protect themselves from their negligence and outright wrongdoings to maintain their power base and the people of Massachusetts seek the abolishment of judicial immunity and State government officials immunity.
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.